Case Analysis based on a deontological perspective, and a utilitarian perspective
A Case Analysis of Carlos a 21-year-old Male with Multiple Gunshot Wounds Case Analysis
This case analysis will analyze a case primarily grounded and to perspectives, a deontological perspective, and a utilitarian perspective. This paper should be about 2-3 pages in length.
All analysis papers are expected to be in APA format (Times new Roman, 12 point font, 1 inch margin, double spaced), three pages in length (Not including references) and NO COVER PAGE. At the top of the page, please only put your name in the header and title each paper “(Title of the paper) Article Analysis”
Grading Rubric
| Not Sufficient | Partly sufficient | Sufficient | |
| Format | 0 pt.
The author did not submit a paper in APA format |
.5 pt.
The author did submit a paper in APA format with a few mistakes |
1 pt.
The author did submit a paper in APA format |
| Facts | 0 pt.
The author did not adequately detail the facts Related to the case |
1 pt.
The author identified a few major facts about the case but overlooked others. The author may have identified an ethical issue but did not identify the core ethical issue. |
2 pt.
The author adequately identified all of the facts associated with this case. The author also adequately identified the core ethical issue. (about 1/2 page of text) |
| Utilitarian argument | 0 pt.
The author did not include a Utilitarian perspective |
1 pt.
The author identified a utilitarian perspective but Did not describe the argument in detail or did not identify are utilitarian course of action. |
3 pt.
The author identified and utilitarian perspective, describe it in detail, and provided a utilitarian course of action. (about ¾ page of text) |
| Deontological argument | 0 pt.
The author did not include a Deontological perspective |
1 pt.
The author identified a Deontological perspective, but does not describe the argument in detail or did not identify are Deontological course of action. |
3 pt.
The author identified and Deontological perspective, describe it in detail, and provided a Deontological course of action. (about ¾ page of text) |
| Final Argument | 0 pt.
The author did not include their own perspective |
.5 pt.
The author identified their own perspective but did not Adequately defend their stance or way the potential options |
1 pt.
The author identified their own perspective, defended it well with robust premises i.e. Explains the pitfalls of one theory and the strengths of the one they chose (about a .5 of text) |
Use the following coupon code :
DISC10
